Here are a few links to posts and articles about the Superbowl that will appeal to number crunchers:
Nate Silver argues that defense wins championships. Many math models show that offense is more instrumental in winning games than is defense. But defense may be better for winning titles. Silver looks at the top 20 defenses and offenses to have played in the Super Bowl according to the simple rating system at pro-football-reference.com. He finds that the team with top defensive teams have won 14 of 20 Super Bowls whereas the top offensive teams have won 10 of 20.
Nate Cohn at the New Republic writes about how football is ripe for reaping the benefits from advanced statistics.
Josh Laurito has a nice post on TV Ratings (as measured by Nielsen) for major league sports championships. The Super Bowl is the only one championship that has been increasing over the past decade or so (shown below). The Superbowl with the highest ratings ever was the 1986 Superbowl featuring the 1985 Bears (this is probably the closest I’ll get to proving that the 1985 Bears was the best team ever.)
I’ve written about football in several posts. One analyzes the Patriots’ decision to let the Giants score a touchdown in last year’s Superbowl using a decision tree.
I also have three presentations on football decision making.
The first illustrates when a team should go for a two point conversion using dynamic programming:
The second looks at when a team should go for it on fourth down using decision trees:
The third uses game theory to find the best mix of run and pass plays.
February 1st, 2013 at 2:44 pm
..and the Ravens are ON IT!