Unemployment among recent PhDs has been in the news quite a bit lately. I am going to make a case for getting a STEM PhD by showing you the good, the bad, and the ugly. My stance is that a PhD can be a great idea even though PhDs are not as lucrative as they have been in the past.
Jordan Weissmann wrote two posts in The Atlantic about unemployment among recent PhD graduates [Link and Link] and discussed these articles on NPR [Link]. The National Science Foundation collects the data at the time of graduation, and from what I can tell, their numbers are highly accurate based on excellent participation in their surveys. As far as operations research goes, IE degrees are in the “engineering” category and math and CS are in the “physical sciences” category. (I have done my own calculations on the NSF data that show the same trends. When I give seminars at universities, I like to share this data with students in a separate seminar just for students.) Here are two of Weissmann’s figures.
Jordan Weissmann implies that post-docs are not employed. Sure, this may count as underemployment, since many of those with post-docs would prefer something more permanent, but it’s slightly disingenuous to consider post-docs to be unemployed. Still, I think it is important to separate our post-docs from other full-time jobs as Weissmann has done. He also notes that American-born PhDs do somewhat better than foreign-born PhDs in the job market – Americans have higher levels of full-time employment.
One reason that recent PhD unemployment levels are so high is because students may look for industry jobs after they graduate. Many find jobs immediately after graduation. This may be particularly true in fields like engineering, where more students than average get industry jobs (unlike academic jobs, industry jobs can be sought and found the summer after graduation). It’s worth noting that NSF does not track unemployment rates a year after graduation, so we don’t really know what happens. We can say that PhDs do not appear to have a problem with chronic unemployment. However, the data above show that it’s getting harder to find a job. It’s worth noting that between 2001 and 2011, the number of students graduating with PhDs increased from 40,744 to 49,010, an increase of more than 20%. This is a big increase in enrollment, and it seems to have affected employment opportunities. PhD graduation rates dipped slightly in 2001 (as compared to the late 1990s), and you can see in the figures above that 2001 was a good year for PhD graduates finding jobs.
Megan McArdle writes about how there may be too many STEM PhD students [Link]. She is concerned that the growth in science PhDs is driven by grant funding and the need for post-docs rather than by the supply of jobs that require a science PhD, which can lead to unemployment after graduation. And that is probably a legitimate concern in some fields. She cites NIH funding, which doesn’t grow the pool of operations research and mathematics PhD students too much. When my current department started a PhD program, we had to justify why our graduates would get employed with the state of Virginia – and that was back in 2007-2008 when PhD unemployment was not in the popular press so much. To be honest, I don’t know what the state does about PhD unemployment rates – presumably nothing since they are just starting to track students graduating with Bachelor’s degrees. I do think that as a nation, we need to not push harder to grow PhD programs without growing jobs as well.
These unemployment rates are depressing, but not getting a PhD may be worse. In another one of Jordan Weissmann’s articles, he writes that recent college graduates (BS/BA degree holders) have a 53% unemployment/underemployed rate [Link]. This seems horribly depressing. You can check the Bureau of Labor Statistics site [Link] for more statistics on unemployment/underemployed. Unfortunately, the BLS does not have many charts on education level. This one [Link] shows that unemployment for those with college degrees is now down to 3.8%, but that includes not-so-recent college graduates.
Here is another figure on BS/BA graduates.
Several posts have argued with the premise that STEM PhDs have high levels of unemployment. Derek Lowe of “In the Pipeline” argues that unemployment among chemistry PhDs are way lower than unemployment in the general population and among those with Bachelor’s degrees [Link]. The American Chemical Society (ACS) cited a 4.6% unemployment level among its members in March 2011 (it’s lower now) [Link]. There are two problems with using these numbers to determine whether to get a PhD now:
- This unemployment rates is from ACS members, and they have a biased sample. Unemployed chemists are less likely to pay ACS dues and are thus less likely to get asked to fill out ACS surveys. Plus, those who are unemployed are less likely to answer the unemployment question. This is the same issue that universities face with their graduating students – those with jobs tend to fill out outgoing student surveys, thus skewing employment levels. Therefore, the ACS survey likely underestimates the unemployment rate.
- The bigger problem is that the survey is from all ACS members. We are concerned with unemployment among recent PhD program graduates. The ACS survey does not give any insight into whether newly minted PhDs can expect to get a job.
However, a low PhD unemployment rate is consistent with all the statistics I can find. Here are a few other things to consider. First, the BLS shows a low unemployment for PhDs, which corroborates Lowe’s finding that PhDs can get jobs. But it doesn’t have enough information to show that recent PhDs can get jobs.
This post [Link] by Catherine Rampell at the NY Times shows the unemployment rate for those aged 20-29 but doesn’t specifically look at PhD graduates:
These figures look at unemployment rate but not income. In an article that I cannot find at the moment, those with Bachelors degrees have seen their income just keep pace with inflation over the past 40 years. Those with advanced degrees have seen their incomes grow faster than inflation (see this link for the concept).
A PhD may not be as lucrative as it used to be, but I still think it’s a great idea to get a STEM PhD. Here are my reasons:
- Industry jobs continue to employ recent PhDs. And industry jobs pay very well.
- It’s a stochastic process: what was true in the past may not be true in the future. It’s hard to understand the employment rates among recent PhDs, but from what we know, unemployment rates for PhDs are lower than those for students with lower levels of education. Chronic unemployment does not seem to be a systemic issue for PhDs, and PhDs make more than their BS and MS counterparts. I see these trends continuing in the future albeit to a lesser degree.
- Yes, PhD students lose out on potential income for 5-6 years when they are in graduate school, but they get paid to get a STEM PhD, so it should not lead to extra loans. I started a Roth IRA as a graduate student. Getting a STEM PhD is different than going to law or medical school in this regard, and I think this is a huge plus.
- Many universities were not hiring in 2009-2010. This led to more post-docs than usual. Universities are hiring again, and all those post-docs are ultimately getting full-time work. But recent PhDs often have to compete with post-docs for tenure track positions, which makes it harder for now. Eventually, this may work itself out. College is as popular as ever, and universities will need faculty to teach all of these students (although many are making do with instructors and adjuncts).
- And finally, field matters and the PhD program matters. The statistics above do not tease out those those who graduate from top programs (like top 10 or top 25). Students from top PhD programs are generally highly recruited – with some bias, I can recommend one stellar ISyE department for getting an operations research PhD. I recommend that students be very direct about employment options before they select a graduate school. Going to a top school makes a big difference for business school [Link] and law school [Link] – and it’s true for STEM PhDs, too. But if your employer is paying for your PhD, then this is less of an issue.
Do you think that PhDs are still worth it? My post focuses on getting a PhD in the US – are PhDs still worth it internationally? If you have a PhD, would you get one all over again if you were graduating from college now?
March 12th, 2013 at 2:14 pm
I am in my first year in a doctoral training centre in the UK (focussed on physical sciences of imaging applied to biomedicine) and those first few graphs had me very worried!! As far as I’m aware, employment prospects are worse in the UK and financial matters and job prospects were key factors I considered when deciding to go for a PhD. I couldn’t really imagine not doing science and so I went for it even if prospects aren’t great
March 12th, 2013 at 3:51 pm
It proves that my decision was not good in terms of incomes. Getting PhD after Professional degree.
March 12th, 2013 at 4:19 pm
My experience with MBA programs, which I think also applies to PhD programs, is that they’re somewhat countercyclical: when the economy goes bad and jobs are tight, people go back to college for graduate degrees. So the 20% jump in enrollments is probably in part due to the ’07-’08 meltdown, and likely will subside when the economy gets going — which, if the recovery creates STEM jobs at the bachelor level, will be about when we’ll need more PhD-qualified instructors.
March 14th, 2013 at 9:18 am
Thanks, all. I have received some feedback on other social networking sites that continues to be pessimistic about getting STEM PhDs. This post on Drug Monkey (http://scientopia.org/blogs/drugmonkey/2013/01/28/shut-off-the-phd-tap/) shows the massive increase in biomedical PhDs in the past 5 years but slow growth in chemistry PhDs. It is evidence of the impact in NIH funding in increasing PhDs in certain fields.
I can’t find my links on PhD salaries over time as compared to BS and MS degree holders. I’ve been skeptical that PhD salaries grow faster over time than BS and MS salaries. But that is largely because I got my PhD just before the economic downturn when professor salaries have basically not grown. That will not last forever. I recently found an article by an economist that has convincing data on PhD salaries, but alas, I cannot find the link. This post from the Gene Expressions blog dissects this issue a bit (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/07/the-wages-of-a-life-science-ph-d-not-high/#.UUHbqdbkvO8).
March 14th, 2013 at 1:52 pm
For international students, especially those from China, a US PhD degree is very attractive, especially in STEM, not only because the doctorate degree is going to help them to be very competitive in the future job market in either China or US, but also because the PhD salary is much higher than they may get paid if they find a job with a bachelor degree in China. As far as I know, more and more international masters and phds return to their home country, which may not be included in the stat, or may be counted as “unemployed”. Moreover, international students is a huge part of graduate students!
March 21st, 2013 at 2:04 pm
So there are 40k graduates a year, therefore about 1.5m phd holders in the USA (assuming that on average person works for 40 years after phd), or just about 1% of civilian labor force (150m from Blanchard’s Macroeconomics). Really, who cares about 1%? The only sensible reason to do PhD is passion for science and discovery and in this case it’s well worth 4 years of your life, regardless of the prospects.
July 12th, 2014 at 7:39 am
“For international students, especially those from China, a US PhD degree is very attractive, especially in STEM…”
Yes, that’s the problem. You’re taking away the few jobs which are still available from US citizens with science doctorates. I am a 51 year old underemployed PhD organic chemist.