Mike Trick’s post on the status of P=NP is required reading. He writes about a new review paper on the status of P=NP (by Lance Fortnow at Northwestern) and its corresponding New York Times article. I had not heard about either. There have been a few recent developments on the P=NP front (check out the blog Godel’s Lost Letter and P=NP for updates). I have trouble keeping track of all of the news and had always felt like a review article was needed. I am thrilled that one now exists, along with the newspaper article to explain the concept more clearly to non-experts. I will be using both in some of my classes. For more info, please check out Mike Trick’s blog post.
October 8, 2009
The status of P=NP? Still open.
By Laura Albert
This entry was posted on Thursday, October 8th, 2009 at 11:24 am and tagged with computing and posted in Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
2 responses to “The status of P=NP? Still open.”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Search Punk Rock OR:
Punk Rock OR Tweets
- It's good to review this from time to time #timemanagement twitter.com/lizandmollie/s… 7 hours ago
- These guidelines are really fantastic 💯 The pub #’s are eerily close to mine so maybe it’s not a surprise that I he… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 23 hours ago
- I got my second shot yesterday. Thank you, scientists! ❤️ #vaccinated https://t.co/BMSiuIbzzz 2 days ago
- I searched for cookie pictures on my iPhone for my 10yo’s class project. The search returned 13 pictures. 9 of 13 w… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
- RT @PKeskinocak: Our recent research shows that if NPIs are lifted prematurely while #COVID19 #vaccines are distributed, infections, hospit… 3 days ago
- I had a great lab lunch today over zoom. As a group we discussed time management and how to estimate how much time… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago
Recent Comments
Tags
academia analytics art aviation blogs cheese computing conferences cooking coupons criminal justice data decision analysis disasters education elections emergencies environmentalism & natural living finance football analytics grand challenges health healthcare higher education holidays home homeland security humanitarian invited talks lightning lottery march madness math programming mip MODA newspapers Olympics optimization OR in the news pandemic PhD phd support pirates podcast and video Poisson politics probability public policy publishing queuing risk communication sabbatical science communication science fair secretary problem slidecasts social justice social networking sports star wars stochastic processes supply chains teaching teaching with technology traffic Transportation TSP twitter vampires weather werewolves women work-life balance writing zombies
October 9th, 2009 at 11:12 am
“He writes about a new review paper on the status of P=NP (by Lance Fortnow at Northwestern) and its corresponding New York Times article. I had not heard about either.”
Hm, didn’t you?
😉
Kind regards,
fbahr
October 9th, 2009 at 11:54 am
Thanks! I guess I remember reading that article but didn’t make the connection until you pointed it out. (I tweeted that the week our classes started and was a bit frazzled). I am touched that someone actually paid attention–kudos fbahr! This also indicates how much I like Mike Trick’s post–it made much more of an impression to me than the original article I read.